Comments for Saint Mary's University Womens Centre http://www.smuwomenscentre.com Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:21:10 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 Comment on Why have a Women’s Centre? by online banking http://www.smuwomenscentre.com/2009/02/07/why-have-a-womens-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-33 online banking Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:21:10 +0000 http://www.smuwomenscentre.com/?p=23#comment-33 I think that is an interesting point, it made me think a bit. Thanks for sparking my thinking cap. Sometimes I get so much in a rut that I just feel like a record. I think that is an interesting point, it made me think a bit. Thanks for sparking my thinking cap. Sometimes I get so much in a rut that I just feel like a record.

]]> Comment on Why We Oppose SMUSA’s Decision to Ratify Students For Life by Ted http://www.smuwomenscentre.com/oppose-smusas-decision-to-ratify-students-for-life/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Ted Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:30:44 +0000 http://www.smuwomenscentre.com/?page_id=361#comment-32 This article is the most blatant argument against free speech that I have ever read. It even argues against the existence on campus of groups that oppose the view of the writer on the grounds that their very existence is harassing and emotionally upsetting. What kind of a country is the writer ensvisioning, where the existence of groups they deem upsetting would be denied. The incoherent comment from "woman orgasms" is either a joke or it is an example of unthinking applause from someone whose ability to think--or, to be charitable, to understand English--must be called into question. This article is the most blatant argument against free speech that I have ever read. It even argues against the existence on campus of groups that oppose the view of the writer on the grounds that their very existence is harassing and emotionally upsetting. What kind of a country is the writer ensvisioning, where the existence of groups they deem upsetting would be denied.

The incoherent comment from “woman orgasms” is either a joke or it is an example of unthinking applause from someone whose ability to think–or, to be charitable, to understand English–must be called into question.

]]>